Sometimes I think that we try to implement technology in a classroom when it isn't needed. Of course, this is a technology course that I am in, so it should be expected. But I also think that sometimes we use technology for the sake of using technology. \

A common argument for integrating technology within a classroom is because it can "engage the students". This bothers me. Students shouldn't need a screen or smart board to become engaged in a lesson. As teachers, we shouldn't have to rely upon technology to get our students involved. 

Using online Mind Maps is a good example. In class we were given the opportunity to use the program Bubbl.us. This was a great website for creating online brainstorming maps. We also got the opportunity to use Inspiration, some software used for brainstorming (you actually have to pay for this one). 

I was captivated by the idea that students could use this technology in class and have a great way to map out their thoughts. 

But... wait... can't we just get out a pencil and paper and write it all down? Maybe it's just because that's what I grew up using, but it seemed so simple at the time. Why should we complicate a simple concept that drawing out your own mind map? I suppose you can argue the pros and cons of each. They are the same, but different. 

What do you think? Is it worth giving students a computer to create a mind map, or should they just use paper
?



Leave a Reply.